Let’s keep it simple and say that if her work casts aside what is “normal,” then her approach must be different. Ok, assuming that D is correct, the first part of our sentence should describe the playwright’s approach based on the fact that her work casts aside theatrical norms. “The playwright’s approach is (i)_ in that her works (ii) jettisons the theatrical devices normally used to create drama on the stage.” Let’s see how our choice affects our sentence: We should definitely go ahead and start testing out our answers for blank (i) while assuming that “jettisons” is correct for blank (ii). In other words, we don’t have any evidence that there’s anything to strip away about these “devices.” Again, without a whole lot of clues it’s hard to immediately say this is wrong, BUT it doesn’t seem like a very good answer. Her works could “distill” or boil down normal devices-but it’s a little unclear what that might entail. However, we should note that D seemed like a more logical action given that the object was “normal devices.” This phrase could logically work, and we don’t have a TON of clues, so we’ll have to leave it in. The playwright’s work certainly could “experiment with” or test out normal devices, but it almost seems like this would work better if our sentence talked about “abnormal devices.” In other words, using “normal devices” doesn’t seem like much of an experiment. This is pretty similar to what we were guessing a good answer might be, so let’s keep it. However, we know that the writers of the GRE love to play with the context in which a word can be used, and to “jettison” something could just mean to figuratively cast it aside or discard it. To “jettison” something is literally to throw or drop something from an aircraft or vessel, usually in order to make it lighter. We can predict that our second blank might say she “abandons” these devices that are “normally used.” Let’s see if there’s an answer that matches. Since we’re making a prediction about our second blank first, let’s start there and work backwards. If we find a good pair, we’ll know we have some potential answers-if not, we’ll revise our prediction and try again. Of course here we could be dead wrong-maybe the sentence says she “closely adheres” to these normal devices, but let’s go out on a limb and guess that she doesn’t. That “normally” could maybe be a clue in that it almost seems to imply that her work does not follow a normal pattern. The sentence says her works do something to the devices normally used to create drama on the stage. There’s one other subtlety we might pick up on, though, if we read carefully. Well, it’s not ideal, but in this case, it looks like one thing we’re going to have to consider is what answers pair well together. That is, moderately helpful-EXCEPT both blanks seem like they could provide a clue for the other. Our first blank is followed by “in that,” which signals that the second part of the sentence elaborates on the ideas in the first part. Not a whole lot of information here, but let’s look for any clues in signal words or sentence structure that might give us an idea as to how our blanks relate to one another and the rest of the sentence. Those text completion questions can be kind of tricky, especially those of the two-blank variety-but never fear, PrepScholar has got your back! Buuuut then you had some questions about the verbal section-specifically question 3 of the second Verbal section on Practice Test 1. So, you were trying to be a good test taker and practice for the GRE with PowerPrep online. The playwright’s approach is (i)_ in that her works (ii)_ the theatrical devices normally used to create drama on the stage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |